Astro Static Site Development
Astro's actual advantage: JavaScript by default is zero
Most modern frontend frameworks ship JavaScript to the browser even for pages that are almost entirely static content. Astro's core idea is the opposite default: pages ship zero JavaScript unless a specific component genuinely needs interactivity, which it then loads individually rather than shipping a whole framework runtime for a mostly-static page. For content-heavy sites - marketing pages, blogs, documentation - this produces a genuinely faster experience than the framework-everywhere default.
What we build
- Marketing and content sites where most pages are static, with interactive components (forms, filters, widgets) loaded selectively only where needed
- Blog/documentation sites with fast page loads and good SEO fundamentals as a natural consequence of minimal JavaScript
- Integration with a headless CMS if your team needs to publish content without touching code
- Migration from a heavier framework (Next.js, Gatsby) when a site is genuinely more static than the current stack assumes
When Astro is - and isn't - the right choice
Astro fits content-heavy sites well. It fits less well for applications that are genuinely interactive throughout - a dashboard, a client portal with constant state changes - where a full framework's client-side capabilities are actually needed, not incidental. We'll recommend against Astro if your project is really an application, not a content site, even if Astro is the more fashionable choice at the moment.
Pricing
Rs 40,000-180,000 depending on number of page templates, CMS integration, and how many interactive components are needed.
Related
Web Development · Figma to Code · All services